Municipal biosolids management in the U.S. sits at an inflection point. In recent decades, utilities have increasingly turned to beneficial reuse through agricultural land application, compost, and other land-based uses. Beyond providing a relatively simple and low-cost management pathway, beneficial reuse supports utility sustainability goals by locally recycling nutrients and organic matter rather than treating biosolids solely as waste.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are challenging this model. Conventional wastewater treatment does not fully remove or destroy these compounds, allowing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to pass through treatment and, in some cases, concentrate in biosolids that are subsequently applied to land. The scale and long-term effects of these releases on human health, food supplies, and ecosystems remain uncertain. But growing public awareness, restrictions on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in consumer products, and stringent drinking water standards are increasing scrutiny of biosolids management.
Without clear federal standards for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in biosolids, states are moving ahead with their own, varied, regulatory approaches. While these efforts generally follow common themes, differences in testing requirements, concentration thresholds, and land-application restrictions are creating an increasingly complex regulatory patchwork for utilities and biosolids managers to navigate.
This Insight Report examines the structure and market effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances-related regulations and associated trends that are reshaping municipal biosolids management in the U.S.
Table of Contents
Section 1 – PFAS and the Biosolids Challenge
- PFAS Is Reshaping Biosolids Management, Not Replacing Land Application
- Mapping the PFAS Contamination Cycle
- Market Drivers: Forces Reshaping Biosolids Management
Section 2 – Regulatory Landscape
- Federal Inaction Pushes PFAS Biosolids Regulation to the States
- PFAS Oversight Expands Without Common Regulatory Standards
- State PFAS Pathways Reshape Biosolids Costs and Market Opportunities
- Tiered PFAS Models Converge on Initial Thresholds, Diverge on Restrictions
- Multiple States Show Signals of Incoming Regulation
Section 3 – Land Application Alternatives & Outlook
- Incineration Cannot Absorb a Broad Shift Away from Land Application
- Landfills Are the Backup, but at a Higher Cost
- PFAS Destruction Technologies Remain Costly and Unproven at Scale
- Utilities Hedge Against Future Disposal Costs with Water Removal
- New Regulations Will Create Diverging Paths for Future Biosolids Market Growth
Section 4 – Appendix
- Advanced PFAS-Related State Biosolids Rulemaking in 2026
- Failed PFAS-Related State Biosolids Rulemaking in 2026
- Emerging Michigan Model States
- Established Michigan Model States
- Established Basic Monitoring States


